Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Can Personal Ethics Co-Exist with Sexual Promiscui

  1. #1
    HB Forum Moderator Alex's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 29th, 2000
    Posts
    11,383
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    You start.

    ------------------
    Alex

  2. #2
    Inactive Member Beta-Decay's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 19th, 2000
    Posts
    1,417
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)
    Yes, but i don't know how.

    ------------------

  3. #3
    HB Forum Moderator Alex's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 29th, 2000
    Posts
    11,383
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I don't think they can exist either.

    Oh great, now what!

    ------------------
    Alex

  4. #4
    HB Forum Owner SHATOUSHKA's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 18th, 2001
    Posts
    22,191
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)
    let's arm wrestle

    ------------------
    ~~share some greased tea with me~~
    General Philosophy

  5. #5
    HB Forum Owner SHATOUSHKA's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 18th, 2001
    Posts
    22,191
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Thumbs up

    no, its a contradiction in terms.

    ------------------
    ~~share some greased tea with me~~
    General Philosophy

  6. #6
    HB Forum Owner SHATOUSHKA's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 18th, 2001
    Posts
    22,191
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)
    your turn....

    ------------------
    ~~share some greased tea with me~~
    General Philosophy

  7. #7
    HB Forum Moderator Alex's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 29th, 2000
    Posts
    11,383
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Ah, forearm play. rolleyes

    ------------------
    Alex

  8. #8
    Inactive Member Terygon's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 2nd, 1999
    Posts
    363
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Why would the two be mutually exclusive? Say I come up to you, tell you I'd like to have sex with you, however I have had, do have and likely will have many partners besides you. If you say OK, we find a place to get it on. If you say no, I bow politely and disappear into the mist. What's unethical about that?

    ------------------
    Not Intolerent, Just Clueless
    Ruler of Rugby, Patron Saint of the All-Blacks, First Among Equals in California
    Official SiP Forum Poop-Face, Killjoy and Inventor of BiPs -- My Finest Creation
    Not Bambi, not Tambi, I'm the EVIL Baker.

  9. #9
    HB Forum Moderator Alex's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 29th, 2000
    Posts
    11,383
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Until the day arrives when we treat our non-sexual partners equal to our sexual partners, personal ethics will always take a backseat to Sexual promiscuity.

    In your scenario, you said you would walk away, because the other person said no, and that would be fine. Walk away as in "see ya".

    But if you had had even remotely good sex with that person, in one way or another, that person will probably remain in your life.

    And down the road, the person you had sex with (unless it was awful) will have "favored nation" status over those you don't have sex with.

    The sex card leads to further possiblities.

    The values, responsiblity, or ethics card, usually leaves you with less from others, but more from within.


    ------------------
    Alex

  10. #10
    HB Forum Owner SHATOUSHKA's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 18th, 2001
    Posts
    22,191
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Lightbulb

    i think alex went off into a 'future tense' tangent. (love it!)
    anyhoooo,
    the two are significantly diverse, thusly, they cannot, nor will they ever be compatible under any circumstances. here's why:

    simple:

    the fact that you went up to anyone and asked for sex means that your sexual promiscuity proceeds your ethics.

    amen.

    ------------------
    ~~share some greased tea with me~~

    General Philosophy

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •